Difference between revisions of "Talk:History of Gramps"
m |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:Gioto|Gioto]] ([[User talk:Gioto|talk]]) 03:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | [[User:Gioto|Gioto]] ([[User talk:Gioto|talk]]) 03:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, aside from the added context of date, the XML Schema makes the 1st table superfluous. (It is also a bit too 'technical' for a good history page.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The comparative Navigator bars is nice. It has a nostalgic feel that fits a 'History' page. But the main page comparison is a bit too much. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Copying Don's blog is both good and bad. Unless we get someone to do something similar for the missing 2006-2024 timeline, it would just make the page seem incomplete... and undermine confidence if we cannot document an orderly turnover of of project officers. | ||
| + | [[User:Bamaustin|Bamaustin]] ([[User talk:Bamaustin|talk]]) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
=Copy blog article here?= | =Copy blog article here?= | ||
If no one is opposed? | If no one is opposed? | ||
https://gramps-project.org/blog/2006/04/looking-back-over-5-years/ | https://gramps-project.org/blog/2006/04/looking-back-over-5-years/ | ||
Revision as of 03:58, 13 March 2024
Merge table
Seems to be multiple tables of Gramps version related information with slightly different columns, would anybody be opposed to me merging a few table to make it simpler to maintain?
Too much information in table makes content difficult for readers to assimilate.
But maybe we should look for way a master table could drive subsets of data?
Bamaustin (talk) 02:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Real question is apart from the original start date of Gramps and do we really need a table on this page that only differs from Previous_releases_of_Gramps with the Schema table column that appears on the following pages table anyway?? Gioto (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, aside from the added context of date, the XML Schema makes the 1st table superfluous. (It is also a bit too 'technical' for a good history page.)
The comparative Navigator bars is nice. It has a nostalgic feel that fits a 'History' page. But the main page comparison is a bit too much.
Copying Don's blog is both good and bad. Unless we get someone to do something similar for the missing 2006-2024 timeline, it would just make the page seem incomplete... and undermine confidence if we cannot document an orderly turnover of of project officers. Bamaustin (talk) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Copy blog article here?
If no one is opposed? https://gramps-project.org/blog/2006/04/looking-back-over-5-years/
